![]() I have said that MacDonald can be acquitted of the charge of grave intellectual dishonesty only on pain of conviction for gross incompetence, and I provided ample evidence in my previous post. It is not, for reasons I will get to presently.) ![]() ![]() (To be sure, he thinks this nastiness is justified by the polemical tone of my book and by my aggressive response to his nastiness. A slightly chastened MacDonald has now himself admitted (in what he says will be his final word on my book) that he “was not comfortable with conclusions” he had drawn after his first attempt to deal with the substance of my arguments, that he has “misunderstood” at least some of those arguments, and that his contemptible Himmler comparison “was perhaps over the top.” Yet he commends to us his final feeble effort to respond to my arguments, still appears to cling to for the most part to his earlier criticisms, and retracts none of the nastiness he has relentlessly directed towards me personally. ![]() ![]() If there is any lingering doubt, the present post will dispel it. That Eric MacDonald’s criticisms of my book The Last Superstition are devoid of any merit whatsoever is clear from the evidence adduced in the two posts I have devoted to him already ( here and here ). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |